feat(agent-runtime): add LLM-driven AI Planner with dual-provider tool calling
Replaces the stub Planner's fixed describe_screen/[] behavior with a real decision-maker: AIPlanner uses native tool/function calling (Anthropic or OpenAI, pluggable via AI_PLANNER_PROVIDER) to select exactly one grounded action per turn, with an explicit finish_task(success, reason) tool for completion/failure instead of an ambiguous "no tool call" signal. Default disabled (AI_PLANNER_ENABLED=false) and additive; TaskRunner falls back to the existing stub Planner unchanged when disabled. Amends CONSTITUTION.md's Perception Boundary with one narrow exception: only the AI Planner may receive the current step's raw screenshot bytes alongside Scene, for vision-grounded coordinate grounding. Also fixes a latent gap in TaskRunner.run(): observe/plan exceptions are now caught per iteration and turned into a failed task with a failure_reason, instead of propagating uncaught. openspec change: ai-planner-runtime. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
`docs/ROADMAP.md` places the Planner inside Milestone 3 (Agent Runtime):
|
||||
"Planner/Executor structure, tool execution, retry behavior, and task
|
||||
runner," already implemented by `apex-agent-mvp`. What `apex-agent-mvp`
|
||||
actually shipped for the Planner half is `runtime/planner.py::Planner` — a
|
||||
stub that returns one hardcoded `describe_screen` step, then `[]` forever.
|
||||
Every later milestone built real capability around this stub (`Executor`
|
||||
retry/backoff, `TaskContext` memory, `semantic-scene` enrichment,
|
||||
`world-model` cross-step state) without ever giving the loop a real decision
|
||||
-maker. This change closes that gap: an `AIPlanner` that uses native LLM
|
||||
tool/function calling to choose one grounded action per turn, wired into
|
||||
`TaskRunner` behind a default-off flag so applying this change does not
|
||||
change any existing task's behavior, cost, or dependencies unless explicitly
|
||||
enabled.
|
||||
|
||||
Two decisions were fixed before design work started (not re-litigated here):
|
||||
a **pluggable dual-provider** abstraction (Anthropic tool use and OpenAI
|
||||
function calling, switchable via config) rather than a single hardcoded
|
||||
provider, and **Scene + screenshot** (vision multimodal) as the Planner's
|
||||
perception input rather than Scene-only — the latter requires the Constitution
|
||||
amendment covered in Decision D5.
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals / Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals:**
|
||||
- Replace the stub decision logic with a real LLM call that chooses exactly
|
||||
one tool (action or `finish_task`) per `plan()` invocation, using the
|
||||
current `Scene`, optionally the current screenshot, and recent
|
||||
`WorldState` history as input.
|
||||
- Support both Anthropic and OpenAI as interchangeable providers behind one
|
||||
internal `ToolCallingClient` interface, selected by configuration alone.
|
||||
- Keep the change strictly additive and default-disabled: with
|
||||
`AI_PLANNER_ENABLED` unset (or false), `TaskRunner`'s constructed planner,
|
||||
control flow, and dependencies are byte-for-byte the same as before this
|
||||
change.
|
||||
- Make task completion and task failure both explicit, model-driven signals
|
||||
(`finish_task(success, reason)`) rather than inferring completion from the
|
||||
absence of a tool call.
|
||||
- Preserve every Constitution invariant except the one explicitly amended
|
||||
(Perception Boundary), and amend that one as narrowly as the vision
|
||||
requirement allows.
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Goals:**
|
||||
- No multi-step lookahead planning — `AIPlanner.plan()` always returns 0 or 1
|
||||
step; `TaskRunner.run()` already re-observes and re-plans every loop
|
||||
iteration, so pre-planning multiple steps ahead would only drift from the
|
||||
actual screen state.
|
||||
- No `wait`/no-op tool. Forcing "exactly one tool call per turn" means the
|
||||
model cannot express "do nothing this turn" — a real but low-severity gap
|
||||
(a spurious action self-corrects next turn once the loop re-observes).
|
||||
Candidate for a v1.1 follow-up, not this change.
|
||||
- No dynamic tool subset per task or app — the six-tool face
|
||||
(`ACTION_TOOL_SPECS` + `finish_task`) is fixed.
|
||||
- No `find_text_on_screen`/`find_icon_on_screen`/`describe_screen_semantic`
|
||||
exposed as Planner tools — the per-turn `Scene` JSON already enumerates
|
||||
every element's id/type/text/bounds, so a "search for X" tool call would
|
||||
only add latency and hallucination surface without adding information the
|
||||
model doesn't already have.
|
||||
- No automatic retry of a failed LLM call inside `AIPlanner` or
|
||||
`ToolCallingClient` — a transient failure surfaces as a failed task via the
|
||||
`TaskRunner.run()` fix in D7, matching the project's existing convention
|
||||
that retry is `Executor`'s concern for tool execution, not the Planner's
|
||||
concern for its own decision calls.
|
||||
- No provider/model selection exposed as an API request parameter — v1 is a
|
||||
deployment-time/environment-variable choice only.
|
||||
- No backfill of `openspec/specs/agent-runtime/`, which does not exist
|
||||
because `apex-agent-mvp`'s `agent-runtime` capability was never archived
|
||||
into `openspec/specs/`. This is a pre-existing gap unrelated to this
|
||||
change; this change's `specs/agent-runtime/spec.md` uses `## ADDED
|
||||
Requirements` against that unarchived baseline, the same way
|
||||
`semantic-scene-runtime` and `world-model-runtime` each did.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### D1: Single-step, ReAct-style `plan()` — never multi-step
|
||||
`AIPlanner.plan()` returns a list of 0 or 1 `PlannedStep`. `TaskRunner.run()`
|
||||
already calls `observer()` then `_plan()` fresh on every loop iteration
|
||||
(`runtime/task.py`), so a Planner that tried to hand back several steps at
|
||||
once would either have those extra steps silently ignored by the loop's
|
||||
current per-iteration contract, or require changing that contract to consume
|
||||
a queue — both worse than just re-deciding every turn against the freshly
|
||||
observed `Scene`.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: return a short queued plan (e.g. up to 3 steps)
|
||||
and only re-plan when a step's expectation is violated. Rejected — UI state
|
||||
can change after any single action (a dialog appears, a keyboard covers an
|
||||
element), so a queued step is frequently stale by the time it would execute;
|
||||
single-step keeps every action grounded in the turn's actual `Scene`.
|
||||
|
||||
### D2: Explicit `finish_task(success, reason)` control tool, not an implicit "no call" signal
|
||||
Task completion and task failure are both signaled by the model calling
|
||||
`finish_task` — never by the model declining to call any tool (which native
|
||||
tool-calling APIs do not reliably support as a distinguishable "done" state
|
||||
across both providers) and never by a heuristic on the Planner's side.
|
||||
`finish_task(success=True)` maps to `AIPlanner.plan()` returning `[]`, which
|
||||
reuses `TaskRunner.run()`'s existing `if not steps or ...: return
|
||||
self._complete_task(task)` short-circuit unchanged. `finish_task(success=
|
||||
False, reason)` maps to `AIPlanner.plan()` raising `TaskFailedError(reason)`
|
||||
— reusing `core/errors.py`'s `TaskFailedError`, defined since
|
||||
`apex-agent-mvp` but never previously constructed anywhere in the codebase.
|
||||
These two outcomes are deliberately routed through different mechanisms
|
||||
(empty list vs. exception) rather than both returning `[]` with a status
|
||||
flag, because `run()`'s short-circuit condition is `if not steps or
|
||||
self.planner.goal_reached(...)` — a bare empty list on failure would be
|
||||
silently read as success by that exact line.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: signal success via `goal_reached()` returning
|
||||
`True`. Rejected — see D3.
|
||||
|
||||
### D3: `AIPlanner.goal_reached()` always returns `False`
|
||||
This is a required invariant, not a style choice. `run()` evaluates `if not
|
||||
steps or self.planner.goal_reached(...)` — the `or` means `goal_reached()` is
|
||||
still consulted even when `steps` is non-empty. If `goal_reached()` could
|
||||
ever return `True` on a turn where `plan()` also returned a real action, that
|
||||
action would be silently discarded and the task would be marked complete one
|
||||
turn early. Routing every completion/failure signal exclusively through
|
||||
`finish_task` (D2) removes any reason for `goal_reached()` to do anything;
|
||||
it is a permanent no-op override, documented as such at the call site.
|
||||
|
||||
### D4: Dual-provider abstraction via `Protocol`, forced single-tool-call on both
|
||||
`runtime/tool_calling_client.py` defines `ToolCallingClient` as a
|
||||
structural `Protocol` (matching the existing precedent of
|
||||
`semantic/enricher.py::SemanticLLMClient` and
|
||||
`skills_learning/embeddings.py::EmbeddingClient` — no ABC is used anywhere in
|
||||
this codebase for a swappable single-method client), with concrete
|
||||
`AnthropicToolCallingClient` and `OpenAIToolCallingClient` implementations
|
||||
selected by `build_client(config)` based on `AI_PLANNER_PROVIDER`. Both
|
||||
implementations force the API to return exactly one tool call per turn —
|
||||
Anthropic via `tool_choice={"type": "any", "disable_parallel_tool_use":
|
||||
True}`, OpenAI via `tool_choice="required"` plus the top-level
|
||||
`parallel_tool_calls=False` — so a single `ToolCallDecision` can always be
|
||||
parsed deterministically regardless of provider. Both implementations use
|
||||
the lazy-import-plus-injectable-transport pattern already established by
|
||||
`semantic/llm_client.py::AnthropicSemanticClient` (SDK imported only inside a
|
||||
`_client()` method; constructor accepts an optional `transport` for tests),
|
||||
and wrap every SDK/network/parse failure into one internal
|
||||
`ToolCallUnavailable` exception, mirroring `EnrichmentUnavailable`.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: a single hardcoded Anthropic-only client (the
|
||||
simpler default for a first LLM-driven Planner). Explicitly rejected by
|
||||
product decision before this design was drafted — dual-provider
|
||||
pluggability is a requirement, not a nice-to-have, for this change.
|
||||
|
||||
### D5: Perception Boundary amendment — narrow, Planner-only screenshot exception
|
||||
The Constitution's Perception Boundary previously stated `Scene` is the
|
||||
*only* perception artifact the LLM sees. Vision-grounded action selection
|
||||
(precise tap/swipe coordinates, disambiguating visually-similar elements
|
||||
that OCR/UI-tree fusion can conflate) requires the Planner to also see the
|
||||
raw screenshot for the current step — a deliberate product decision, not an
|
||||
oversight. The amendment is written to be as narrow as that requirement
|
||||
actually is: it names one consumer (`the runtime-layer AI Planner, and only
|
||||
that Planner`) and explicitly reaffirms that every other layer/consumer
|
||||
(`api`, `tools`, `perception`, `storage`, or any other LLM consumer) still
|
||||
never receives raw screenshot bytes, and that `Scene` itself is still
|
||||
produced exclusively through `PerceptionProvider`. See "Constitution
|
||||
Compliance" below for the exact before/after text.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: keep `Scene` as the Planner's only input
|
||||
(Scene-only, no vision). Explicitly rejected by product decision before this
|
||||
design was drafted, for the reasons above.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: broaden the exception to "any runtime-layer LLM
|
||||
consumer" instead of naming the Planner specifically, anticipating future
|
||||
vision consumers. Rejected — Change Discipline requires each change to
|
||||
justify its own scope; a hypothetical future consumer should justify its own
|
||||
amendment when it exists, not inherit a pre-approved blank check today.
|
||||
|
||||
### D6: Default-disabled via `AI_PLANNER_ENABLED`, mirroring existing LLM-feature flags
|
||||
`PlannerConfig.enabled` defaults to `False`, and `load_config()` reads
|
||||
`AI_PLANNER_ENABLED` the same way `semantic/config.py`,
|
||||
`skills_learning/config.py`, and `agents/config.py` gate their own
|
||||
LLM-backed behavior — off unless explicitly turned on. (`world/config.py`'s
|
||||
`WorldConfig.enabled` defaults `True`, but that capability makes zero LLM
|
||||
calls and is not a counterexample to this convention.) `TaskRunner`'s
|
||||
`_default_planner()` follows the same "self-loaded config, enabled flag
|
||||
picks the implementation" shape already used for `world_model` and
|
||||
`on_task_succeeded` (`runtime/task.py`), so no change to `api/rest.py` or any
|
||||
other caller of `TaskRunner()` is required to preserve current behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### D7: `TaskRunner.run()` gains a try/except around observe+plan
|
||||
Before this change, `run()` had no error handling around
|
||||
`self.observer(...)` or `self._plan(...)` — safe only because the stub
|
||||
`Planner` never raised. `AIPlanner` can raise for real reasons (network
|
||||
failure, malformed provider response, `TaskFailedError` from D2's
|
||||
`finish_task(success=False)` path), so `run()` now catches any exception
|
||||
from that per-iteration observe-then-plan sequence and marks the task
|
||||
`status="failed"` with `failure_reason=f"{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}"`,
|
||||
returning immediately. Two failure modes are avoided by doing this
|
||||
explicitly rather than skipping it: an uncaught exception leaving a
|
||||
`BackgroundTasks`-invoked task stuck at `status="running"` forever, and a
|
||||
catch-and-return-`[]` degrade pattern (as used by
|
||||
`semantic/enricher.py::enrich_scene()`) that would be misread as task
|
||||
success by the same `if not steps or ...` short-circuit discussed in D2/D3.
|
||||
**Alternative considered**: copy `enrich_scene()`'s catch-and-degrade-to-None
|
||||
pattern. Rejected — that pattern is correct for an optional enrichment pass
|
||||
where the caller has a defined fallback (use the raw `Scene`). The Planner
|
||||
has no such fallback: if it cannot decide, the task cannot proceed, and
|
||||
pretending otherwise (via an empty list) means silent, incorrect "success."
|
||||
|
||||
### D8: `_planner_accepts_world()` generalized to `_planner_accepts(name)`
|
||||
`TaskRunner` already used `inspect.signature` reflection to decide whether to
|
||||
pass a `world=` kwarg to `Planner.plan()`, so that narrow-signature test
|
||||
Planners (e.g. `NoWorldPlanner`) would not receive an unexpected keyword
|
||||
argument. This change generalizes that one method to take the parameter name
|
||||
as an argument and reuses it for both `"world"` and the new `"screenshot"`
|
||||
kwarg, preserving backward compatibility with any existing `Planner`
|
||||
subclass that does not declare a `screenshot` parameter (or `**kwargs`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Constitution Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
- **Device Boundary**: unaffected — this change adds no driver code and does
|
||||
not touch `driver/`/`device/`.
|
||||
- **Tool Boundary**: unaffected — `AIPlanner` calls tools exclusively through
|
||||
`PlannedStep` → `Executor`, the same as the stub `Planner`; no new code
|
||||
imports a concrete driver or bypasses `tools/`.
|
||||
- **Perception Boundary**: amended, narrowly, per D5. The invariant that
|
||||
`Scene` is the only perception artifact for every consumer *except* the
|
||||
named Planner is preserved and made explicit in the same sentence as the
|
||||
exception, rather than being loosened globally.
|
||||
- **Runtime Boundary**: preserved and, in fact, fulfilled by this change —
|
||||
the existing text already states "LLM dependencies enter at `runtime`
|
||||
through Planner behavior," which is exactly what `AIPlanner` is. The
|
||||
Executor remains the only component that calls tools and handles
|
||||
tool-execution retries; `AIPlanner` does not call tools directly or
|
||||
implement its own retry loop (D7 fails the task instead of retrying).
|
||||
- **Change Discipline**: the dependency direction (`core -> driver/device ->
|
||||
tools -> perception -> storage -> runtime -> api`) is preserved — all new
|
||||
code lives in `runtime/`, imports flow downward only (`runtime/ai_planner.py`
|
||||
imports from `runtime/`, `core/`; nothing in `core`, `driver`, `device`, or
|
||||
`tools` imports anything LLM-related). The new external integration (the
|
||||
OpenAI SDK, newly *used* though already declared as a dependency) is added
|
||||
at the adapter layer that owns the concern (`runtime/tool_calling_client.py`),
|
||||
not at the domain or device boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Risk] Per-step LLM call adds latency and cost to every planning turn**
|
||||
→ Mitigation: default-disabled (D6); `AI_PLANNER_TIMEOUT_SECONDS` bounds
|
||||
worst-case latency; no in-`AIPlanner` retry (D7) means a slow/failing
|
||||
provider fails fast instead of compounding delay.
|
||||
- **[Risk] Hallucinated tool arguments (e.g. tap coordinates outside any
|
||||
element's bounds)** → Mitigation: the system prompt instructs the model to
|
||||
ground every coordinate in the current turn's `Scene` element bounds (and
|
||||
screenshot, when present); a bad tap still degrades gracefully into an
|
||||
ordinary failed/retried step through `Executor`'s existing mechanism,
|
||||
unchanged by this design.
|
||||
- **[Risk] Provider wire-format drift (Anthropic/OpenAI SDK or API changes)
|
||||
silently breaks request construction or response parsing** → Mitigation:
|
||||
all format-specific logic is isolated into small, independently unit-
|
||||
tested functions (`_anthropic_tool`, `_openai_tool`,
|
||||
`_decision_from_anthropic_response`, `_decision_from_openai_response`)
|
||||
against fake transports, so a drift shows up as a specific, localized test
|
||||
failure rather than a silent behavior change.
|
||||
- **[Risk] Two providers could behave inconsistently** (e.g. one honors
|
||||
`finish_task` semantics more reliably than the other) → Mitigation: both
|
||||
are constrained by the identical `ALL_TOOL_SPECS` JSON Schema and the same
|
||||
system prompt; provider-specific behavior differences are a model-quality
|
||||
concern to observe via the optional real-integration test, not something
|
||||
this design can fully eliminate structurally.
|
||||
- **[Risk] Perception Boundary amendment could be read as a precedent for
|
||||
loosening the invariant further** → Mitigation: the amendment text itself
|
||||
names exactly one consumer and restates the "no one else" constraint in
|
||||
the same breath (D5); any future consumer needs its own amendment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Purely additive; no data migration:
|
||||
1. Add the five new `runtime/*` files and the `runtime/planner.py`/
|
||||
`runtime/task.py` edits described in Impact. With `AI_PLANNER_ENABLED`
|
||||
unset, `TaskRunner()` continues to construct the stub `Planner` exactly as
|
||||
before.
|
||||
2. Amend `docs/CONSTITUTION.md`'s Perception Boundary section (D5).
|
||||
3. No changes to `storage/`'s timeline format, `api/rest.py`, or `api/mcp.py`.
|
||||
4. Rollback is simply leaving `AI_PLANNER_ENABLED` unset/false, or reverting
|
||||
the changed files; no other capability depends on this one.
|
||||
5. Enabling in a real environment requires setting `AI_PLANNER_ENABLED=true`,
|
||||
`AI_PLANNER_PROVIDER` (`anthropic` or `openai`), and the corresponding
|
||||
provider's API key in the process environment (already-existing SDK
|
||||
convention, not a new config surface this change introduces).
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Whether a `wait`/no-op tool is actually needed in practice, or whether the
|
||||
self-correcting-next-turn behavior of a spurious action is good enough
|
||||
indefinitely — deferred to real usage observation, not decided here.
|
||||
- Whether `AI_PLANNER_TIMEOUT_SECONDS`'s default (30s) is well-tuned against
|
||||
real provider latency for image-bearing requests — needs tuning against
|
||||
real usage data once this is enabled somewhere with real traffic; not
|
||||
fixed by this design.
|
||||
- Whether provider/model selection should eventually move from
|
||||
environment-variable/deployment-time to a per-task or per-request choice —
|
||||
leaning toward "not until a concrete need appears" (YAGNI), consistent
|
||||
with `semantic-scene-runtime`'s D4 reasoning for its own model choice.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user